Absorption of dry matter, crude ash, and crude fat in the gastrointestinal tract of bugai at different amounts of soluble protein in the diets

Keywords: dry matter, crude ash, crude fat, soluble protein, digestibility, complex stomach, small intestine, large intestine

Abstract

In red steppe cattle with duodenal and ileocecal anastomoses when fed isoenergetic, isoprotein hay-concentrate rations with different levels of soluble protein (SR), the digestibility of dry matter (SR), crude ash (CW) and crude fat (CW) was studied separately in a complex stomach , small (TnK) and large (TsK) intestinal sections. Different amounts of RchSP in the rations were achieved by feeding grist from natural and roasted peas at a temperature of 105°C.

When feeding the experimental ration with a reduced level of RchSP against the background of a decrease in the apparent intensity of digestion, which was manifested in a smaller amount of duodenal and ileocecal chyme, significant changes in the digestibility of SR, SZ and SZ were observed in the postruminal sections of the gastrointestinal tract. According to the general digestibility of SR in the entire alimentary canal and prestomach, in the small and large intestines, there were different directions and degrees of changes in the experimental and control diets. The digestibility of SZ, while being the same in the entire alimentary canal, differed most significantly between rations in the complex stomach and TsK, less so in TnK. On the experimental diet, absorption of dietary fiber in the small and large intestines was 18% lower. The actual level of digestibility of dietary fiber in the animal body did not correspond to the value determined by the formula "feed minus feces" and was 2 times higher in the control diet and 1.4 times higher in the experimental diet.

The assimilation of dietary fiber in the studied rations in the alimentary canal had a multidirectional character and, in general, was lower in the experimental ration. The actual digestibility of dietary fiber, compared to the "visible" digestibility of the control diet, was 17% higher, and the experimental diet was 3% lower.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

NRC. 2001. Nutrient Requirements of Dairy Cattle. 7th rev.ed. Natl. Acad. Press, Washington, DC.

Bohdanov, G. O., Kandyba, V. M. (Ed.) (2012). Normy i ratsiony povnotsinnoyi hodivli vysokopro-duktyvnoyi velykoyi rohatoyi khudoby. Dovidnyk-posibnyk [Norms and rations of complete feeding of highly productive cattle. Reference manual]. Kyyiv: Ahrarna nauka [In Ukrainian].

Kandyba, V. M., Ibatullin I. I, Kostenko V. I. (Ed.) (2012). Teoriya i praktyka normovanoyi hodivli ve-lykoyi rohatoyi khudoby /Monohrafiya [Theory and practice of standardized feeding of large cattle / Monograph /] Zhytomyr [In Ukrainian].

INRA. 2018. INRA feeding system for ruminants. Wageningen Academic Publishers. Wageningen, the Netherlands

Piatkovskiy, B., Goffmann L., Kauffolʹd P., Shimann R., Shtegger G., Foygt Yu. (1978). Ispolʹzovaniye pitatelʹnykh veshchestv zhvachnymi zhivotnymi [Nutrient use by ruminants]. (N. S. Gelʹ-man. Trans.). Moskva: Kolos [In Russian].

Vasilevskiy, N.V., Berus, M.V., Zlobina, G.S., Tsyupko, V.V. (1992). Novyy sposob otsenki vliyaniya kolichestva i kachestva syrogo proteina korma na yego perevari-vaniye v zheludochno-kishechnom trakte bychkov. [A new method for assessing the impact of the quantity and quality of crude feed protein on its digestion in the gastrointestinal tract of bulls]. Novoye v metodakh zootekhnicheskikh issledovaniy, Mat. konf. [New in zootechnical research methods. Mat. conf. 25.6.1992 part 2]. Kharkiv. [In Russian].

Yanovych, V. H., Solohub, L. I. (2000). Biolohichni osnovy trans-formatsiyi pozhyvnykh rechovyn u zhuynykh tvaryn [Biological bases of transformation of nutrients in ruminants]. Lʹviv: «Triada plyus» [In Ukrainian].

Sineshchekov, A. D. (1965). Biologiya pitaniya sel’skokhozyaystvennykh zhivotnykh [Biology of nutrition of agricultural animals]. Moskva: Kolos, [In Russian].

Valigura, V. I., Il’inskiy, A. V., Boyko, O. D. (1992). Kompleksnaya metodika opredeleniya pokazateley pe-revarivaniya i ispol’zovaniya pitatel’nykh veshchestv i energii zhvachnymi zhivotnymi [A comprehensive methodology for determining the indicators of digestion and use of nutrients and energy by ruminants] Novoye v metodakh zootekhnicheskikh issledovaniy. [// New in methods of zootechnical research]. Kharʹkov. [In Russian].

Aliyev, A. A. (1980). Lipidnyy obmen i produktivnost’ zhvachnykh zhivotnykh [Lipid metabolism and productivity of ruminants]. Moskva: Kolos, [In Russian].

Gnoyevoy, V. I., Trishin, A.K., Gnoyevoy, I. V. (2017). Biomorfologicheskaya organizatsiya i pitatel’nost’ kormov: monografiya [Biomorphological organization and nutritional value of feed: monograph]. Kharʹkov: FLP Brovin A.V. [In Russian].

Rokitsky, P. F. (1967). Biologicheskaia statistica [Biological statistics]. Minsk: Highest. school, [In Russian].

Klitsenko, H. T., Kulyk, M. F., Kosenko, N. V., Lisovenko, V. T. (2001). Mineral’ne zhyvlennya tvaryn [Mineral nutrition of animals]. Kyyiv: Svit [In Ukrainian].

. Dmytrochenko A.P. (1973). Rezul’taty yssledovanyy po myneral’nomu pytanyyu sel’skokhozyaystvennykh zhyvotnykh // Myneral’noe pytanye s.-kh. zhyvotnykh [Results of research on the mineral nutrition of agricultural animals // Mineral nutrition of agricultural animals. Animals]. Moscow: Kolos. [In Russian].

Bohdanov, G. O., Rudenko Ye. V. (Ed.). (2009). Informatsiyna baza danykh khimichnoho skladu kormiv Ukrayiny dlya orhanizatsiyi obhruntovanoyi hodivli sil’s’kohospodars’kykh tvaryn [Information database of the chemical composition of fodder of Ukraine for the organization of sound feeding of agricultural animals]. Kharkiv: Instytut tvarynnytstva UAAN [In Ukrainian].

Published
2022-11-18
How to Cite
Kozyr, V. S., Petrenko, V. I., Maistrenko, A. N., & Dimchya, G. G. (2022). Absorption of dry matter, crude ash, and crude fat in the gastrointestinal tract of bugai at different amounts of soluble protein in the diets. Animal Husbandry of the Steppe of Ukraine, 1(2), 95-102. https://doi.org/10.31867/2786-6750.1.2.2022.95-102